ISO/IEC 42001 · AI Management System

ISO/IEC 42001MADE ACHIEVABLE FOR SMBS

The world's first AI Management System standard wasn't built only for the Fortune 500. RAIC compresses the seven hardest implementation problems into a workflow your team can actually run.

ISO 42001 in 60 seconds

First-of-its-kind

The first international standard for AI Management Systems (AIMS), published by ISO/IEC in 2023.

Plan-Do-Check-Act

A continuous management-system loop: govern, operate, monitor, and improve your AI portfolio.

Scales to your size

The standard is risk-proportionate — but the documentation and accountability bar is real, even for small teams.

The 7 SMB implementation challenges

These are where ISO 42001 implementations stall — and where most SMB compliance budgets quietly disappear.

Challenge 1

Accelerator for IT teams, resellers & MSPs

Traditional ISO 42001 paths run into the tens of thousands and stall on senior-staff time. RAIC gives in-house IT teams, resellers, and managed service providers a turnkey AIMS workspace and a ready body of evidence they can stand up for clients in days instead of months.

Challenge 2

Documentation burden

Policy, risk assessment, SoA, impact assessments, audit programme, system docs — assembling the AIMS library from scratch is weeks of work without templates.

Challenge 3

Internal AI expertise gap

Few SMB teams hold both AI and governance know-how. Implementations stall when legal, IT, and data-science accountabilities cannot be coordinated.

Challenge 4

Shadow AI inventory gaps

ISO 42001 starts with a complete AI inventory. Most organizations cannot produce one because employees adopt AI tools faster than IT can track.

Challenge 5

Role ambiguity & accountability fog

Annex A demands documented AI ownership. Informal SMB cultures rarely have it — corrective actions stall and the AIMS becomes a paper exercise.

Challenge 6

Supplier & third-party AI risk

Most AI an SMB uses comes from vendors. ISO 42001 requires that supply-chain risk be assessed alongside internally-built systems.

Challenge 7

Continuous monitoring

Plan-Do-Check-Act is ongoing. Spreadsheet governance cannot keep pace with model drift, bias, and new regulation between surveillance audits.

How RAIC closes each gap

Every challenge maps to a clause in the standard — and a capability already shipped in RAIC.

ChallengeISO 42001 clauseRAIC capability
Accelerator for IT teams, resellers & MSPsClauses 4–10 (whole AIMS)Subscription pricing from $349/mo plus pre-built workflows, branded evidence exports, and Aslan AI drafting — purpose-built so IT teams, resellers, and MSPs can deliver ISO 42001 outcomes for their clients without a custom consulting build.
Documentation burdenClauses 7.5, 8.x, Annex A38 Annex A controls pre-mapped, editable policy templates, and a one-click branded SoA export covering Stage 1 and Stage 2 prep.
Defined roles, accountability, and documented decisionsClauses 5.1, 5.3, 9.3, A.3.2A configurable authority matrix names who may approve what and who may accept residual risk, generated approval routes enforce it, and the decision, action, and exception registers give management review a documented record instead of recollection.
Internal AI expertise gapClauses 7.2–7.3, A.3.2Role-based workflows, guided intake, and the Aslan AI co-pilot for risk, gap, and policy drafting.
Shadow AI & inventory gapsClause 4.3 (Scope), A.6Browser-extension Shadow AI discovery + Microsoft Graph integration continuously surface unsanctioned AI for intake.
Role ambiguity & accountabilityClauses 5.3, A.3.2AI System Registry assigns owners, reviewers, and approvers with full audit-trail governance per record.
Third-party AI riskClause 6.1, A.8Unified registry covers internal and third-party AI; Supplier register tracks DPAs, sub-processors, and evidence.
Continuous monitoringClauses 9–10Live dashboards, scheduled reviews, KPI plans, and automated nonconformity workflows keep PDCA always-on.

What you get on day one

Every capability below is shipping today in RAIC and is named so your procurement, audit, and compliance teams can verify it against the standard.

AI System Registry

AI System Registry: Single source of truth for every internal and third-party AI system, with owner, approver, and reviewer per record.

Use Case Register

Use Case Register: Structured intake for every proposed AI use case, with tier-based approval routing.

AI Risk Register

AI Risk Register: Dual inherent-vs-residual risk on every AI System and AI Use Case — 5×5 likelihood-by-impact heatmap toggles between before-controls and after-controls, with the delta shown on register exports and PDF/DOCX reports. Risk treatment plans are versioned per risk.

ISO 42001 Dataset Registry

ISO 42001 Dataset Registry: Inventory of training, validation, and production datasets with PII, bias, and provenance fields, linked many-to-many to AI systems. Required evidence for Annex A.4.6 and A.7.4.

AI Competence Matrix

AI Competence Matrix: Per-role competence requirements plus internal and external training evidence with cadence-based reviews. Required evidence for Clause 7.2 and 7.3.

EU AI Literacy Course Seed

EU AI Literacy Course Seed: Five ready-to-deploy AI literacy courses mapped to EU AI Act Article 4.

Policy Library

Policy Library: 10 editable AI policy templates including AI Agent Acceptable Use, version history, and branded export.

Supplier Register

Supplier Register: Third-party AI suppliers with DPAs, sub-processors, evidence files, and review cadence.

Documented Information Index

Documented Information Index: Single index of all AIMS documents with type, owner, lifecycle state, and review date. Required evidence for Clause 7.5.

AIMS Scope & Governance

AIMS Scope & Governance: Scope, leadership, objectives, and interested parties with versioned drafts and history.

Internal Audit Programme

Internal Audit Programme: Lead auditor → quality review → management acceptance → findings closed workflow. Required evidence for Clause 9.2.

Management Review

Management Review: Versioned reviews capturing all Clause 9.3.2 inputs and 9.3.3 outputs with per-review action items.

Nonconformity & Corrective Action Register

Nonconformity & Corrective Action Register: Opened → root cause → corrective action → effectiveness check → closed workflow. Required evidence for Clause 10.2 and Annex A.10.2.

Continual Improvement Register

Continual Improvement Register: Identified → in progress → implemented → verified → closed workflow. Required evidence for Clause 10.1.

Operation & Monitoring

Operation & Monitoring: KPI plans, breach detection, and incident tickets you can promote to a risk or a nonconformity. Required evidence for Annex A.6.2.6.

External Auditor Workspace

External Auditor Workspace: Isolated read-only environment for your certification body, with engagement-locked checklist and findings.

Trust Portal

Trust Portal: Customer-facing evidence room with NDA gate, access requests, and 30-day analytics.

Audit-ready exports

Every register exports the document your auditor actually asks for, branded with your organization and timestamped.

  • Statement of Applicability (SoA): Branded DOCX and XLSX covering all 38 Annex A controls.
  • Internal Audit Report: Branded DOCX covering the full Clause 9.2 audit cycle.
  • Management Review Pack: Branded DOCX covering 9.3.2 inputs and 9.3.3 outputs.
  • Risk Treatment Plan: Per-risk versioned DOCX tied to your risk register.
  • Nonconformity Register: Branded DOCX of every nonconformity and its corrective action.
  • Dataset Registry Snapshot: CSV inventory for dataset evidence reviews.
  • Competence Matrix Snapshot: Branded DOCX matrix for Clause 7.3 evidence.
  • Annex IV, IX, XI, XII, and XIII Packs: Branded ZIP packs for EU AI Act technical-file requirements.
  • Recertification Pack: Branded ZIP bundling twelve registers for surveillance and recertification audits.

Every file ships with the RhindonCyber_ prefix and a timestamp so your auditor knows exactly which export they are reading.

Why this matters now

EU AI Act deadlines are approaching, enterprise procurement questionnaires increasingly demand evidence of AI governance, and regulator expectations are rising globally. RAIC's multi-framework mapping — ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, and the EU AI Act — means the governance you build for certification also satisfies the adjacent requirements coming next. One platform. One audit trail. Durable.

ISO/IEC 42001 Annex A pre-mapped
NIST AI RMF crosswalk built-in
EU AI Act actor-role workflow
NEW · In-platform assessment

ISO 42001 Framework Assessment

Run a scored ISO 42001 readiness assessment inside RAIC and export the results — plus the underlying evidence — as an audit-ready download. Stop rebuilding the same gap analysis in spreadsheets.

Scored assessment

Question-by-question readiness scoring with maturity bands, owner assignment, and re-assessment cadence.

Mapped to the standard

Every item maps to Clauses 4–10 and the 38 Annex A controls — so a single answer drives both the score and the evidence trail.

Downloadable evidence

Export a branded DOCX report plus a ZIP of the underlying evidence (RhindonCyber_ISO-42001-Assessment_*.docx + .zip) — ready to hand to your auditor.

Framework Assessment + downloadable evidence is available on ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, SOC 2, CIS Controls v8.1, and HIPAA.

See ISO 42001 done right

Spin up a tenant in minutes. Free for 14 days.